Home › Editorial Policy
Editorial policy
Chain Pursuit publishes practical, source-led guidance for people affected by crypto fraud. This page explains who writes our articles, how they are reviewed, how we use AI, and the standards every page is held to.
Who writes our content
Our articles are written by Chain Pursuit's founders, Golan Ben Moshe and Yair Revach, who also review each other's work. Each article carries a named author. Where an article concerns a specialised security mechanism, it is additionally reviewed against primary sources by our editorial team, and we are working to add a named technical reviewer with a credential in blockchain forensics or security for those pages.
How we use AI
Our articles are drafted with the assistance of AI tools and then reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by named humans before publication. We disclose this plainly rather than conceal it. AI assists with drafting and structure; the facts, sources, and editorial judgement are human-checked, and no article is published without that review.
Our sourcing standard
We build on primary sources: government agencies and regulators such as the FTC, the FBI's IC3, the CFTC, CISA, and NIST, standards bodies such as OWASP, and official documentation from wallet and exchange providers. We separate confirmed facts from uncertain ones, cite sources near high-stakes claims, and never invent statistics, cases, quotes, or outcomes. Our full approach is in Sources and methodology.
What we will not do
- We do not guarantee that any loss can be recovered, and we say so plainly where recovery is unlikely.
- We never ask anyone for a seed phrase, private key, password, or remote access, and we warn against anyone who does.
- We do not invent case studies, testimonials, credentials, or named victims.
- We do not claim a wallet address identifies a person, and we distinguish blockchain visibility from legal authority.
Most of our articles end with a "what this guide cannot do" section. That honesty is deliberate: the realistic answer is sometimes that nothing can be done, and you deserve to hear it.
Review and updates
Each article shows a review date. High-change pages, those citing current figures, live incidents, or reporting procedures, are reviewed roughly every 90 days. Evergreen guides are reviewed at least annually. When the underlying facts change, we update the page and its date.
Corrections
If we get something wrong, we correct it and note the change. If you spot an error, tell us at contact@chainpursuit.com and we will review it promptly.
Independence
Our editorial decisions are not influenced by any third-party firm. How we are funded, and how we keep that separate from our content, is set out in How we make money.